The AAV is $3.75 M for the next two years, however, one could argue the value isn't wrong for the contract, it's the term. While Davidson wanted to make younger defensemen compete for a spot in the lineup, to force the team's hand. While the defensive prospect pool in the Blackhawks system, they will be challenged at training camp this year.
While previously in a top-4 role in Toronto, there will be no pressure for Brodie here in Chicago, which is good. But the issue here is how Kyle Davidson is limiting his prospects with Brodie's term.
Of course, it was nice to give Brodie an extra year on the term, but the Blackhawks have a strong group, in Isaak Philips, Artyom Levshunov, Ethan Del Mastro, Wyatt Kaiser, Louis Crevier, Nolan Allen and Sam Rinzel(eventually) when he signs in the mix.
Given that Brodie is the stronger, veteran option for the Blackhawks it will result in some prospects being held back as a result.
While the prospect pool isn't full, it could stunt growth if a player such as Ethan Del Mastro is held back because of Brodie.
He may have a positive impact in 2024-2025, but in 2025-2026, serious questions should come into play.
Source: The Hockey News
Was Blackhawks' Two-Year Deal for T.J. Brodie Too Long?
POLL | ||
JUILLET 20 | 65 ANSWERS Blackhawks face critism for signing of veteran Toronto Maple Leafs defensemen Should TJ Brodie have been signed to a two-year term? | ||
Yes | 33 | 50.8 % |
No | 32 | 49.2 % |
List of polls |